# Support for bypass / decoupling capacitors

**URL:** https://community.quilter.ai/t/support-for-bypass-decoupling-capacitors/35
**Category:** Planned
**Tags:** placement
**Created:** [January 15, 2024, 8:59pm UTC](https://community.quilter.ai/t/support-for-bypass-decoupling-capacitors/35 "2024-01-15T20:59:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![jarvis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e36b37/32.png) [@jarvis](https://community.quilter.ai/u/jarvis)
#### Post date: [January 15, 2024, 8:59pm UTC](https://community.quilter.ai/t/support-for-bypass-decoupling-capacitors/35/1 "2024-01-15T20:59:36Z")

</div>

Make it possible to identify and reduce distance between bypass / decoupling capacitors and ICs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![miguel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/439d5e/32.png) [@miguel](https://community.quilter.ai/u/miguel)
#### Post date: [February 16, 2024, 6:50pm UTC](https://community.quilter.ai/t/support-for-bypass-decoupling-capacitors/35/2 "2024-02-16T18:50:06Z")

</div>

Agreed, this is the first thing that jumped out at me. Component placement doesn’t pass the sniff test when decoupling caps are in weird places.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![will](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/community.quilter.ai/will/32/98_2.png) [@will](https://community.quilter.ai/u/will)
#### Post date: [March 19, 2024, 12:42pm UTC](https://community.quilter.ai/t/support-for-bypass-decoupling-capacitors/35/3 "2024-03-19T12:42:34Z")

</div>

From #Ideas to #Planned